Internal Attorney Reference · Privileged Work Product · Not for Distribution

Adjustment of Status (AOS) History

What started this

USCIS now calls adjustment of status "extraordinary"

On May 21, 2026, USCIS put out a policy memo, PM-602-0199. Plainly put: when someone applies for a green card from inside the U.S. instead of going back to their home country to do it, the memo tells officers to treat that choice as a point against them — something they now have to make up for with unusually strong circumstances.

Immigration attorneys have two main problems with this. First, calling adjustment "extraordinary" doesn't match what the law actually says or how it grew over time. Second, the memo appears to cherry-pick old court cases — using ones that help its argument and skipping ones that don't.

A lot of this fight is about old Board of Immigration Appeals decisions. The worry: the memo points to a case about fraud to make ordinary green-card applications look "extraordinary," while quietly skipping cases that favor applicants.

Matter of Blas (1974)
Used by the memo. The memo really does lean on this case (confirmed in the memo's own text) to say applicants must make up for any negatives with "unusual or even outstanding" good points. But this case was about someone who lied and deceived immigration officials, so it doesn't really fit normal, honest applicants.
15 I&N Dec. 626 (BIA 1974; A.G. 1976) · Interim Decision #2485 ↗ official EOIR decision
Matter of Arai (1970)
Left out. Said that when there's nothing bad in someone's record, officers should usually rule in their favor. The heavier "unusual or outstanding equities" burden only kicks in when there are negatives — not as a starting point. (Worth knowing: the memo's "administrative grace" phrase actually comes from this favorable case, while skipping its balancing test.)
13 I&N Dec. 494 (BIA 1970) · Interim Decision #2027 ↗ official EOIR decision
Matter of Cavazos (1980)
Left out. Held that even when someone entered with a plan to stay (preconceived intent), adjustment should as a general rule still be granted for an immediate relative of a U.S. citizen — directly cutting against the memo's framing.
17 I&N Dec. 215 (BIA 1980) · Interim Decision #2750 ↗ official EOIR decision
Matter of Ibrahim (1981)
Left out. Confirmed and refined Cavazos, limiting that favorable rule specifically to the immediate-relative category. Useful to cite alongside Cavazos, not instead of it.
18 I&N Dec. 55 (BIA 1981) · Interim Decision #2866 ↗ official EOIR decision